Wilcock Shrout Interview Notes – Part II
Continuing my notes on Winston Shrout being interviewed by David Wilcock. This interview took place to help those of us who would like to better understand the liens that have been filed against the Federal Reserve and the G7 banks. The download link for the interview is at the bottom of part I.
Winston is saying that the basis of Admiralty Law goes back to the Garden of Eden story (21:25) in the King James version of the Bible. Because this particular version of the Bible was authorized to be used in the churches and courts.
The translation of the KJV was overseen by Robert Fludd (22:25). So he would have been responsible for the inclusion of certain Books, and the exclusion of certain Books. In the book The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, Fludd has been alleged to be the sixteenth Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion (a secret society created to protect the Holy bloodline).
Apparently, Robert Fludd skewed the KJV for a particular purpose. Winston commented that “Whether that was for evil or for good, I cannot say, but we have what we have today.” He goes on to say that it is obvious that the United States is operating a Chapter 11 reorganization.
Obvious to him, but not to David (or me). He said, I think, “Thank you Mr. Trafficonti”? That is meaningless to me so if you know what he meant, or said if that wasn’t it, please comment.
Of course, we can’t expect the man to go into every nuance of Admiralty and other law in a 2 hour interview. More details on what he knows is found at wssic.com, where Winston offers his courses for very reasonable fees. He also said if you cannot afford the courses, tell them what you canpay/exchange for them. His goal is to spread this information to all who are willing to learn it.)
He goes on to say that the first declaration of bankruptcy of the United States was the Articles of Confederation (24:25). The second was the Constitution for the United States of America.
“They (US) went into Chapter 11 as a result of having taken up the gold, so that they can no longer execute contracts, which brought an end to Common law.”
I wonder if he means their ability to operate under Common law? Because as far as I know, English Common law is still law in all States except Louisiana.
He goes on to say that Common law is based on use, history, precedents of the particular people, and it was chosen because the founders were English.
Commerce and trade are based on “Law Merchant Law”, which is substantive law.
Negotiable instruments law was created to facilitate trade in commerce 26:18
Uniform Commercial Code to standardize commerce and resolution disputes all over the planet. The word Code means it is a complete fiction.
“It is not necessary to use UCC because you can enforce your maritime contracts, which are substantive, without the use of a fictional code.”
The Admiralty and Maritime deal with contracts (these 2 forms of law are basically now melded together because nearly everyone is using the same currency. You could go back to Maritime if you stopped using the “King’s” currency).
He goes on to say that people have problems because they are allowing equity to seep into their contracts (!?) and if they tighten up their contracts, they wouldn’t have the troubles…
How to tighten? You go back and “re-indenture your trust, and turn it into an express trust so it’s not being operated as a (garbled~!!! darn!).
“Most of the problems that people across the country are facing are because they are involved in implied adhesion contracts, and all manner of things. So I say Hey, go back into the Admiralty, go back into that jurisdiction, re-establish your contracts, tighten them up, and you won’t be having the problems you’re having.”
David presses for a place for listeners to go to read about the law, other than the King James Bible. Winston recommends and analysis of the Old Testament in comparison to the New Testament. The Book of Hebrews, as well. He stands by what he said and that the KJV is a good first primer, and remember who translated it, and that it was approved as law for the church and courts.
“The free enterprises are an invention of Christianity. Not saying they are good or bad, just that is the way it is.”
That’s all I have time for today.



